Regulatory Affairs
Traders Resist NAFDAC Operation as Agency Seizes Counterfeit Packaging Materials Worth ₦200 Million in Aba
NAFDAC has seized counterfeit packaging materials valued at more than ₦200 million from five shops at Old Court Road Market in Aba, Abia State. The operation raises concerns about the potential use of fake labels and packaging to disguise counterfeit products.
The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) has seized counterfeit packaging materials estimated to be worth more than ₦200 million from five shops at Old Court Road Market in Aba, Abia State, following an intelligence-led enforcement operation on Wednesday, 14 October 2026.
According to the agency, its Investigation and Enforcement Directorate uncovered labels, bottle corks, packs and outer packaging materials bearing the names of several alcoholic beverage brands and other consumer products. The materials were allegedly intended for the production and supply of counterfeit packaging.
The brands identified included Jameson, Glenfiddich, Four Cousins, Lord’s Dry Gin, Imperial Blue, Goya Oil, Chelsea, Squadron and Seaman’s Aromatic Schnapps.
NAFDAC said the operation was conducted following credible intelligence about suspected activities involving the production and distribution of counterfeit packaging materials.
Traders resist enforcement operation
The agency reported that its operatives encountered threats and resistance from traders during the raid, making the removal of the seized materials difficult.
The owners of the five shops were reportedly absent when the enforcement team arrived. NAFDAC said the premises were placed on hold to prevent interference with the materials remaining inside.
The agency also invited the market union chairman, who reportedly pledged to safeguard the sealed premises and assist in identifying and presenting the shop owners to the authorities.
The operation's next steps, including the identification of those responsible and any subsequent enforcement or legal action, were not detailed in the initial report.
Why counterfeit packaging poses a public health concern
Counterfeit packaging can be used to make illicit products appear genuine, potentially misleading consumers about their origin, authenticity and regulatory status.
Where fake packaging is used to refill bottles, relabel expired products or distribute adulterated beverages, consumers may be exposed to products whose ingredients, quality and safety have not been adequately verified.
However, NAFDAC's reported findings in Aba concern counterfeit packaging materials. The initial account does not establish that counterfeit or adulterated finished beverages were seized during this particular operation.
The inclusion of packaging bearing the names of several established consumer brands also raises concerns about potential damage to brand integrity and the risk of legitimate manufacturers being associated with products they did not produce.
For pharmacists and other healthcare professionals, the incident reinforces the importance of product authenticity and traceability in protecting consumers. Packaging alone cannot guarantee that a product is genuine, and suspected counterfeit products should be reported to the appropriate regulatory authorities.
Regulatory enforcement and consumer vigilance
NAFDAC's action in Aba highlights the importance of investigating the supply chains that support counterfeit products, including the production and distribution of labels, closures and other packaging components.
Effective enforcement requires more than the seizure of materials. Identifying suppliers, establishing the intended use of the packaging, tracing distribution networks and pursuing appropriate legal action can help authorities address the wider operations behind suspected counterfeiting.
Consumers should purchase regulated products from reputable outlets and remain cautious about products with suspicious labels, damaged seals, inconsistent packaging or unusually low prices. Suspected counterfeit products should be reported to NAFDAC rather than handled or consumed.
The outcome of the Aba operation, including whether the shop owners are identified and whether further enforcement action follows, remains to be established through subsequent official updates.